Back to Blog

GEOBEAT: A Clearer View of Network Geography

8 min readBuilt by Astral

Setting the Stage

The crypto world spends a lot of energy talking about decentralization, but most of that discussion stays inside the protocol. Consensus, clients, staking distribution, governance — all important. What's missing is a clear view of the physical and legal footprint these networks depend on.

Flashbots' post on geographical decentralization made this pretty plain.

Once you start paying attention, you notice how little visibility there is into where nodes actually run, which countries matter most, and how much of the system sits inside a few commercial clouds. People talk about decentralization in the abstract; the real-world structure is something most teams only have a loose sense of.

GEOBEAT is meant to give that structure some shape. The goal is network resilience. Each dimension of the index maps to a form of fragility that geography creates—physical clustering, jurisdictional concentration, and infrastructure dependency.

The Index

The Geographic Decentralization Index (GDI) is a way to summarize the physical, jurisdictional, and infrastructural layout of a network without pretending the problem is simple.

It focuses on three areas:

Physical distribution

How spread out or concentrated the infrastructure is when you look at actual spatial patterns.

Jurisdictional diversity

Which legal systems have influence because that's where infrastructure ends up.

Infrastructure heterogeneity

How much variety there is in clouds, ASNs, and datacenters.

The methods and assumptions are documented in the methodology so people can critique them or propose changes. For a deeper dive into the data, explore the analysis notebook.

The point is to give the community a common starting place rather than a finished verdict. This is v0 of the methodology. Technical choices—thresholds, weights, normalization—are starting points, not settled science. The methodology is documented so the community can critique and improve it.

The Tool

The dashboard at GEOBEAT.xyz turns all of this into something you can inspect directly.

It shows where nodes cluster, which jurisdictions dominate, and how infrastructure choices differ across networks. You can flip between networks, look at sub-index scores, and get a sense of patterns that aren't visible from protocol-level data alone. The dashboard currently displays snapshot data from network crawls. Continuous monitoring is in development.

Think of it as basic geographic literacy for decentralized systems.

Why Geography Matters

Geography shapes how networks behave under stress — regulatory pressure, regional outages, datacenter failures, unexpected incentives, or shifts in where operators prefer to host. These things usually show up before anyone is looking for them.

It's not a theoretical debate; it's the everyday operational substrate these networks sit on. Once you map it, you see how much it influences "decentralization" in practice.

What's Next

Refine the methodology with the community

The index will improve as researchers, client teams, operators, and policy folks weigh in.

Strengthen the data pipelines (in progress)

Reliable feeds across more networks, with better ways to keep inference and telemetry aligned.

Expand coverage

More L1s, L2s, AVSs, rollups, storage networks, and P2P systems.

Develop stronger signals

Inference can only get us so far. We're working toward a framework for multifactor location proofs — combining several independent signals, including cryptographic ones — that make geographic claims more reliable.

Related work: Towards Stronger Location Proofs

If You Want to Talk

Astral is building GEOBEAT as an open measurement layer for network geography. If you're thinking about infrastructure resilience, decentralization standards, or verifiable location systems, we're happy to compare notes.

Explore the Dashboard

See how Ethereum, Polygon, Filecoin, and other networks compare across geographic decentralization metrics.

View Dashboard →